![]() ![]() I accept that getting front line server changes can be hard in many deployment environments, so that is a valid non-technical use case for supporting AJP. Without Jetty 9 AJP support, the only other workaround I see is to switch to Tomcat 8, which would be unfortunate as we've already invested quite heavily in Jetty. I too would prefer to have simply HTTP headers instead of going through an outdated protocol with worse performance, but that doesn't seem to be an option in this case. Unfortunately, approval for configuration changes to the reverse proxy (to add the appropriate headers) is nearly impossible to obtain, and the reverse proxy has been set up to use AJP long before my time. ![]() Thanks for your quick response, and apologies for filing under the wrong priority. Note also, while this issue may be a blocker for your application, it is not a blocker for further releases of jetty, so I'm changing the priority to enhancement request. Note that jetty AJP would need to be extensively rewritten (for the better) to work with the new jetty-9 multi protocol architecture, so it is not a trivial port. Is the work required to encode the x509 details in headers significant? It is pretty simple in Jetty to extract such details from headers and add them to the request correctly. The last time we benchmarked this we achieved 15% better throughput with HTTP rather than AJP! Using apache mod_proxy to forward the request to Jetty as HTTP rather than as AJP is preferable. The lack of AJP support in Jetty 9.1 is hence a blocker. Jetty 8 is stable, but I now would like to take advantage of new features in Servlet 3.1, which is only available in Jetty 9.1.0. This is the approach that has been taken, and hence why my application requires AJP support. The second solution is to use AJP, which contains support for passing along the client certificate via +ExportCertData. The first solution requires installation of headers modules and reconfiguration of the reverse proxy, which is unfortunately not possible due to no root access. Per, there are two main ways to address this problem. The reverse proxy and client cert auth are both requirements due to business constraints. browser) certificate authentication with a Jetty server sitting behind a reverse proxy. The real-world use case is allowing X509 client (i.e. I am currently using Jetty 8 for an enterprise web product that requires AJP support. Per, filing a ticket to reinstate jetty-ajp support in Jetty 9. Dann wählen Sie unterhalb des verschlüsselten Ortdners den Cryptomator Masterkey aus und geben Ihr Passwort ein. Dieses Verfahren funktioniert über verschiedene Geräte hinweg (auch mobil) und auch bei von verschiedenen Nutzern geteilten Daten, sofern das Passwort des Vaults auch geteilt wird.Status ASSIGNED severity enhancement in component server for 9.1.x However, they will also need Cryptomator and the password to decrypt the folder.ĭas Entschlüsseln eines Ordners mit Cryptomator funktioniert folgendermaßen: Wenn Sie einen verschlüsselten Ordner haben, können Sie diesen entschlüsseln, indem Sie auf Plus Klicken "Open Existing Vault". You can invite other users to the folder. They are therefore only decryptable and therefore readable for the end user (= end-to-end encryption). They are not readable for anyone, not even for bwSyncandShare administrators. The encrypted data is now highly synchronized to the server. If you do not remember it, no one can help you to access the data again. Please make sure you remember the password. below bwSyncAndShare (PowerFolder) or Nextcloud in your home directory. Now create a folder below the folder to be synchronized, i.e. To do this, click on Plus and select "Create New Vault". With Cryptomator you create a so-called Vault below the folder to be synchronized. Therefore you must have installed the PowerFolder client or in future the Nextcloud client to use Cryptomator together with bwSync&Share. If you use Cryptomator, you should back up the data elsewhere to be sure that you do not lose any data.Įnd-to-end encryption generally does not work with the web browser. Since, in our experience, data loss can occur when using Cryptomator in conjunction with server-side encryption, we cannot recommend using Cryptomator. If you absolutely need end-to-end encryption, there is the Cryptomator software. The integrated end-to-end encryption in the Nextcloud software used does not work together with the activated server-side encryption. This increases the security level by protecting against attacks on storage space level. With the switch to Nextcloud the storage space is encrypted by default. BwSync&Share offers server side encryption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |